An Adventure in Stockholm, Sweden
Seriously. She is playing with fire if you really have more proof than you're posting so far - maybe she should remember that?
Have you seen her next post?
Unfortunately, yeah. *sigh* Whatever sweetie!
i'm not your "sweetie"i'm glad you read the post. i hope you understood it
No you're right, you're not. I apologies and I take that right back.But you might think about what I said about protesting too much? If you're innocent, why so mad?
Maybe because you're wrongly accusing me of ruining your life? and sending angry readers to my blog, who don't know anything about me?that's a really 1984 remark by the way... "if you've got nothing to hide, then you don't mind us watching". i'm sorry i care about integrity...
*rolling up sleeves to dive in one more time*It's pretty 1984 of you to accuse me of being able to control the internet and force people to go to your blog... and, umm, none of us know anything about you. You're anonymous, remember?
i don't know if you've read 1984? or the word "control" in any of my posts? just because i'm not giving my name and adress and 500 pictures/day, the people who have actually read.my.blog know lots of stuff about me.there's a difference there.oh, and lets not talk about accusation, please. what was it - kettle?
Post a Comment